News and Resources

COVID-19

Governor Hogan Announces the End of Federally Enhanced Unemployment Assistance

Governor Hogan recently announced that Maryland will be ending federally enhanced unemployment assistance paid by the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation, or DLLR, this summer. As part of the federally enhanced unemployment benefits, those who are eligible for traditional unemployment in Maryland have been receiving an additional $300 per week. On June 2, 2021, the State submitted the required 30-day written notice to the Federal Government to opt out of the program. Although the federally enhanced unemployment programs are scheduled to expire in September, these benefits will end for Maryland residents on July 3, 2021. Maryland is joining half the states in the country who are opting out of the enhanced unemployment benefits under ARPA. Employers in Maryland, particularly in the service sector, have been reporting a significant worker shortage and point to the enhanced unemployment benefits as its major cause. Governor Hogan cites increased vaccine availability, Maryland’s close to 70% vaccination rate, and decreasing first-time unemployment claims in further support of the move. In addition to ending the enhanced benefits, Governor Hogan has reinstated the work-search requirements for unemployment beneficiaries that were suspended during the pandemic. Beneficiaries are again required to make at least three re-employment attempts each week to be eligible to receive benefits for that week. By eliminating the enhanced unemployment insurance benefits and reinstating job search requirements to continue receipt of unemployment benefits, Governor Hogan expects more unemployment beneficiaries will return to work, thereby alleviating the worker shortage. The end of the enhanced Federal unemployment assistance does not only affect those who were eligible for traditional unemployment. Those who were placed out of work for reasons that would render them ineligible for traditional unemployment but are still receiving benefits from DLLR likely are beneficiaries of the federal Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program, or PUA. PUA was designed to create a safety net for those who were working in jobs that could not be done remotely or were out of work due to pandemic-related issues. For example, a parent of school-aged children who was required to be home to provide care for their children due to school closures would have received unemployment benefits through PUA even though they would not have otherwise been eligible for unemployment benefits. These benefits will also end on July 3, 2021. While the enhanced benefits will be eliminated after July 3, 2021, the DLLR has promised that any benefits properly owed under either enhanced unemployment or PUA for weeks through July 3, 2021 will be paid to the beneficiaries. This is important because PUA determinations have been particularly susceptible to data entry errors, such as incorrect time periods and other inaccurate information, which have resulted in eligible beneficiaries’ claims being denied. These determinations must be appealed for benefits to be received. At Luchansky Law, we have successfully represented claimants in their appeals before the DLLR and obtained benefits for those who were improperly denied. If you believe you have been wrongfully denied PUA or any other unemployment benefit, give us a call at (410) 522-1020 to schedule a consultatio

Read More »
COVID-19

EEOC Issues Updated Guidance for Employers Regarding COVID-19 Vaccinations

On May 28, 2021, the EEOC issued updated guidance for employers related to COVID-19 vaccinations in the form of updated questions and answers on its site. The full update is available at https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws. In the introduction to the updated guidance, the EEOC explicitly notes that the updated guidance was prepared prior to the CDC’s updated guidance for fully vaccinated individuals such that we can expect additional updates in the near future. The biggest takeaway from the updated guidance is confirmation from the EEOC that, subject to accommodations for individuals with disabilities or sincerely held religious beliefs, it is not a violation of federal EEO laws for employers to mandate vaccines for employees entering the workplace. This is the clearest position that the EEOC has taken on the issue to date and should provide employers additional assurance if they choose to mandate vaccinations. The guidance also provides details on how employees can request accommodations and what accommodations an employer might consider for those employees who are unable to be vaccinated. The updated guidance also explains that information about an employee’s vaccination is to be kept confidential under the ADA, such that any documentation or confirmation of vaccination must be kept confidential and stored in a separate personnel file. However, requesting documentation or confirmation of a vaccination is not a disability related inquiry and, except in specific circumstances, HIPAA does not apply to employer requests for information about vaccination status. Finally, the guidance confirms that employers may offer incentives to employees to obtain vaccinations under a voluntary vaccination program but does little in the way of providing concrete guidance or examples of permissible incentives. Instead, the EEOC simply reiterated the otherwise applicable standard that any incentive must not be so substantial as to be coercive. As the guidance makes clear, if you are considering implementing a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for employees or a voluntary incentive program, there are a number of obstacles to navigate. The attorneys at Luchansky Law are continuously monitoring federal, state, and local developments surrounding COVID-19, which change regularly and can help you formulate and communicate your plans to employees. If you have questions about COVID-19 vaccination mandates or incentive programs, please call Greg Currey at 410-522-1020.

Read More »
Maryland Wage and Hour Law

Federal Court Rejects Employees’ Attempts to Recover Unpaid Wages and Overtime Under Maryland Law for Workweeks in Which They Did No Work in Maryland

In a recent decision that appears to address the issue for the first time, U.S. District Court Judge Peter Messitte ruled that Maryland wage and hour statutes did not entitle members of a class of cable/telephone/internet technicians to recover unpaid wages and overtime earned during workweeks in which they did not perform any work in Maryland. In the case, styled Boyd, et al. v. SFS Communications, LLC, many of the class-member plaintiffs had performed work in multiple states and/or the District of Columbia during the relevant timeframe and sought to recover under Maryland law for all hours for which they had not been fully compensated regardless of where the work been performed. They argued that as long as the defendants were Maryland employers that were subject to liability for violating Maryland law, all unpaid wages and overtime they had earned during the relevant time frame could be recovered under the Maryland Wage Payment & Collection Law and the Maryland Wage & Hour Law. Had that argument been successful, the plaintiffs would have been able to seek treble damages (which are not available under the Fair Labor Standards Act) for all work they performed. The court rejected the employees’ argument, noting that Maryland’s wage and hour statutes were modeled after the FLSA, which permits recovery only for workweeks in which an employee performed work in the United States. Thus, by analogy, Maryland statutes only permit recovery of unpaid wages or overtime associated with workweeks in which at least some work was done in Maryland. The court also cited Maryland’s general presumption against application of Maryland statutes outside of Maryland absent specific language indicating the legislature’s intent that the statute’s reach be so extended. This is an important decision for Maryland employers that face wage and overtime claims from employees who perform work both inside and outside of Maryland. If employees cannot demonstrate that they performed work in Maryland during a particular workweek, a strong argument can be made that they cannot recover treble damages arising from that workweek even if they prove that the failure to pay was not the result of a bona fide dispute. The decision also demonstrates the importance of an employer of maintaining records of where its employees performed their work. Of course, employees whose claims encompass some workweeks in which they worked in Maryland and others in which they worked exclusively in another jurisdiction can bring claims under the laws of both jurisdictions in addition to their FLSA claims. At Luchansky Law, our attorneys are continuously monitoring federal and state developments related to wage and hour claims and have significant experience litigating such claims. If you have questions about the classification of or compensation due your employees or have received a claim letter or lawsuit alleging the violation of wage and hour laws, we can help. Please call us at 410-522-1020.

Read More »
COVID-19

How the CDC and Maryland’s Updated Guidance Impact Employers – 5.19.2021

On May 13, 2021, the CDC issued its Interim Public Health Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People. This guidance, which applies to non-healthcare settings, substantially modified the CDC’s prior guidance as to what activities fully vaccinated individuals may engage in based on updated data on the efficacy of the vaccines. This guidance had two significant takeaways. First, subject to state and local laws and workplace guidance, fully vaccinated individuals may resume indoor activities without wearing masks or physically distancing. Second, fully vaccinated individuals with no COVID-like symptoms following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 do not need to quarantine, be tested, or be restricted from work.Following the CDC’s announcement, on Friday, May 14, 2021, Governor Hogan issued an updated Executive Order 21-05-14-01 lifting capacity restrictions on all businesses in the state of Maryland and the statewide mask mandate. He further announced that work search requirements for continued eligibility for unemployment benefits will be reinstated in late June. For businesses deciding on reopening plans, these developments could potentially be game-changing. By reinstating the work search rules for unemployment benefit eligibility, employees now have an additional incentive to re-enter the workforce. Lifting mask restrictions and capacity limitations makes it easier to resume in-person operations. That said, there are still hurdles to overcome. Employees still need to self-isolate and/or get tested if they have symptoms of COVID-19 and unvaccinated employees need to self-isolate and/or get tested if they have been exposed to someone with COVID-19. For employers with a high number of unvaccinated employees, distancing measures still may need to be maintained and masks for unvaccinated employees may be required. Finally, even for those workers who have been vaccinated, the general question of whether and to what extent remote work should continue to be offered remains.The attorneys at Luchansky Law are continuously monitoring federal, state, and local developments surrounding COVID-19, which change regularly. If you have questions about how to adjust your business’ return to work plan in light of the most recent developments, please call Greg Currey at 410-522-1020.

Read More »
A male supervisor harasses a female employee by touching her inappropriately.
Employer's Toolbox

How to Improve Your Workplace

Complying with harassment legislation is a job you should assign your employment law attorney to ensure that you’re insulated against claims. Find out how compliance works here.

Read More »

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

Let's talk.

Call us at 410-522-1020 or fill out the form below to receive a confidential initial consultation.

Name
Untitled