News and Resources

Firm News

Luchansky Law Celebrates 20th Anniversary Milestone

  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   Towson, MD – Luchansky Law, a leading firm specializing in labor and employment law, proudly announces its 20th anniversary. Since its founding in 2004, Luchansky Law has provided expert legal counsel and exceptional client service, achieving remarkable success and growth over the past two decades.   Under the leadership of Bruce Luchansky, the firm has earned a reputation for diligence, professionalism, and compassion, offering personalized and strategic legal solutions to a diverse clientele. Employment and wage law attorneys at Luchansky Law are champions for employers and executive level employees. Recognizing that employees are the lifeblood of any business—but which often is accompanied by intricate legal complications—the firm specializes in navigating workplace challenges with a balanced approach that serves all parties involved.   “Reaching this 20-year milestone is a testament to our entire team’s hard work, dedication, and passion,” said Bruce Luchansky, Founder and Managing Partner. “We are grateful to our clients, colleagues, and the legal community for their trust and support. As we look to the future, we remain committed to delivering outstanding legal services and fostering long-term relationships.”   Companies hiring Luchansky Law tap into the experience needed to solve complex workplace issues. Unlike many law firms who offer technical or theoretical solutions that may work on paper but not in real life, Luchansky Law focuses on giving clients practical and sound legal advice. The firm combines legal knowledge and practical experience to find the correct legal answers that align with client’s business needs.   Luchansky Law will host a celebratory event later this year to commemorate this significant occasion. The event will bring together clients, colleagues, and community partners to reflect on the firm’s achievements and discuss future initiatives.   The firm’s dedication to client success and ethical practice has been the cornerstone of its enduring legacy. For more information about Luchansky Law please visit https://employmentattorneymd.com.    About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a premier labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. Please call (410) 522-1020, email us at info@luchanskylaw.com, or stop by our office at 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B, Towson, Maryland, 21204. 

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Supreme Court’s Upcoming Decision on FLSA Exemption: Financial Impact on Employers

The U.S. Supreme Court is about to rule on a critical issue regarding the evidentiary standard employers must meet to classify employees as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) overtime requirements. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards affecting private, federal, State, and local government employees. This decision could significantly impact employers in states within the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ jurisdiction, which includes Maryland, by potentially overturning stringent standards and reducing FLSA compliance costs. Employer’s Burden of Proof The Supreme Court will decide whether employers must provide “clear and convincing” evidence or just “some” evidence to prove an FLSA exemption. Currently, the 4th Circuit mandates the higher “clear and convincing” standard, making it more challenging for employers in that region to classify employees as exempt. A decision favoring the 4th Circuit’s standard could increase lawsuits from employees aiming to collect backpay, with employers facing penalties for FLSA violations. At the very least, a decision favoring the 4th Circuit will increase the administrative burden for HR professionals and raise the risk associated with employee classification decisions.  Financial Implications for Employers The FLSA exempts 19 job categories, and disputes over these exemptions are common in litigation, often resulting in significant financial consequences for employers. However, implementing a uniform standard that rejects the 4th Circuit’s stringent approach could lead to cost savings and streamlined processes, offering a more optimistic outlook for employers operating across different jurisdictions. The Supreme Court’s impending decision carries considerable implications for employers. A ruling that lowers the evidentiary burden could streamline exemption analyses and reduce compliance costs, providing advantages for businesses within and outside the 4th Circuit.   For more information about the FLSA case before SCOTUS and how it can affect your business contact (410) 522-1020, email info@luchanskylaw.com, or visit our office at 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B, Towson, Maryland 21204. About Luchansky Law  Luchansky Law specializes in resolving workplace disputes for employers and employees across Maryland. Our attorneys bring extensive experience and a practical approach to protecting your rights, navigating new regulations, and ensuring compliance. Our team combines legal expertise and practical experience to solve workplace challenges and effectively meet legal and business needs.   References Smith, Allen. “Upcoming Supreme Court Decision May Make HR’s Exemption Analysis Less Costly.” SHRM, June 19, 2024.

Read More »
Firm News

Luchansky Law Welcomes Two New Attorneys to the Firm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Baltimore MD – May 2, 2025 – Luchansky Law is pleased to announce the addition of AJ Esral and Alan M. Glickman to the Luchansky Law team. AJ Esral joined Luchansky Law as an associate in 2024. A graduate of the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, AJ brings valuable experience in business law and litigation with a focus on multi-state mortgage insurance. At our firm, AJ supports clients by drafting employment agreements and handbooks, advising on key employment laws—including the FLSA, FMLA, and ADA—and preparing legal briefs and filings. Known for a friendly approach and strong writing skills, AJ is dedicated to helping clients navigate the evolving employment law landscape. Alan M. Glickman brings over two decades of federal government experience to Luchansky Law, having most recently overseen the employment discrimination complaint process for a federal agency of 60,000 employees. As a senior manager and trusted advisor to top agency leadership, Alan gained deep insight into workplace rights and obligations. Now, as an attorney at our firm, Alan is using that expertise to help clients manage complex employment issues with clarity, care, and conviction. Please join us in welcoming AJ and Alan to the firm. Their unique backgrounds and commitment to client service strengthen our ability to provide top-tier counsel to employers across Maryland. About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a preeminent labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. For personalized legal guidance, please contact our office at: (410) 522-1020 | info@luchanskylaw.com |  www.luchanskylaw.com

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Maryland Employers: What the Proposed FAMLI Implementation Delay Means for You

In February 2025, the Maryland Department of Labor (MD Labor) proposed extending the implementation timeline for the state’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program. This adjustment aims to provide employers and workers additional time to prepare for the program’s requirements. Key Changes in the Proposed Timeline Under the revised plan: Payroll Deductions: Would commence on January 1, 2027. Benefits Availability: Eligible employees could begin receiving benefits on January 1, 2028. This proposal responds to recent federal actions that have introduced economic uncertainties affecting Maryland’s workforce, including potential reductions in federal employment and impacts on federally funded private sector jobs. Implications for Maryland Business Owners The proposed delay offers several advantages: Extended Preparation Time: Employers gain additional time to understand the program’s requirements and integrate necessary systems. Financial Planning: Businesses can better plan for the financial aspects of payroll deductions and benefit distributions. Employee Communication: Organizations have more time to educate their workforce about the upcoming changes and benefits. Understanding FAMLI Once implemented, FAMLI will: Provide Paid Leave: Eligible employees can receive up to $1,000 per week for up to 12 weeks to care for a family member or address their own serious health condition. Ensure Job Protection: Employees taking leave under FAMLI will have job protection during their absence. Promote Workforce Stability: By supporting employees during critical times, FAMLI aims to enhance overall workforce morale and retention. Next Steps for Employers While the implementation is proposed to be delayed, it’s crucial for employers to: Stay Informed: Monitor updates from MD Labor regarding the FAMLI program. Review Policies: Assess current leave policies to ensure alignment with upcoming FAMLI requirements. Seek Guidance: Consult with legal professionals to navigate the complexities of the new program and ensure compliance. Prepare Now for Maryland’s FAMLI Program Don’t wait for the deadline—start preparing today. Contact Luchansky Law to review your policies, develop a compliance plan, and ensure your business is ready when the Family and Medical Leave Insurance program takes effect.    

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Maryland Business Owners: What You Need to Know About the State’s Crackdown on Worker Misclassification

A recent report from Maryland’s Joint Enforcement Task Force on Workplace Fraud (JETF) reveals that more than 5,500 workers were misclassified as independent contractors in 2024. This misclassification not only deprives workers of essential benefits—it also exposes employers to serious financial and legal risk, and creates unfair competition for businesses that play by the rules. Why This Matters to Maryland Employers Misclassifying workers can lead to significant consequences: Financial Penalties: The Maryland Division of Unemployment Insurance uncovered over $36 million in unreported taxable wages in 2024. The Comptroller’s Office alone issued more than $3 million in tax, interest, and penalty assessments. Legal Risks: Employers who misclassify workers may be subject to investigations, citations, back taxes, restitution, and penalties under Maryland’s Workplace Fraud Act. Reputational Harm: Companies caught engaging in workplace fraud risk damage to their brand, employee trust, and client relationships. Industries Under Scrutiny While worker misclassification can happen in any sector, the report identifies the most commonly affected industries: Construction Landscaping Home Health Care Janitorial Services Security Transportation For example, in Maryland’s construction industry alone, an estimated 11% of workers are misclassified, depriving the state of vital unemployment insurance and tax contributions. How Employers Can Stay Compliant Maryland’s enforcement activity is ramping up—now is the time to take a close look at your workforce. Key steps include: Review Worker Classifications: Ensure your independent contractors aren’t actually employees under the law. Understand the Rules: Learn the standards under Maryland’s Workplace Fraud Act and federal law. Get Legal Guidance: When in doubt, consult with counsel—especially for gray areas or unique arrangements. Maintain Documentation: Keep detailed records of work arrangements, job responsibilities, and payment methods. Final Takeaway The growing focus on workplace fraud in Maryland is a reminder that worker classification is not just an HR issue—it’s a legal and financial one. Proper classification protects your business, your workers, and your bottom line. Need help reviewing your workforce classification policies? Contact Luchansky Law to speak with an attorney. References Maryland Department of Labor. “New Report on Workplace Fraud in Maryland Finds Thousands of Misclassified Workers” (February 20, 2025) Joint Enforcement Task Force Annual Report (2024). Download PDF

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

FinCEN Delays BOI Filing Enforcement: What Businesses Need to Know

Businesses scrambling to meet the Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) filing deadlines under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) can breathe a little easier. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that it will not enforce BOI filing deadlines or issue penalties until new deadlines are formally established. Key Takeaways: No Immediate Penalties: FinCEN will not impose fines or enforcement actions against businesses that miss the current BOI filing deadlines. New Deadlines on the Horizon: An interim final rule is expected by March 21, 2025, which will extend filing deadlines and provide clearer guidance on compliance. Public Input Matters: FinCEN will seek public input on future revisions to BOI reporting requirements, offering businesses an opportunity to voice concerns and suggest improvements. What This Means for Businesses For companies navigating the complexities of BOI reporting, this delay provides much-needed time to ensure compliance without the immediate threat of penalties. However, businesses should still prepare for the eventual enforcement of the rules and stay updated on the forthcoming changes. At Luchansky Law, we understand the evolving landscape of regulatory compliance and are here to help businesses stay ahead of their obligations. If you have questions about BOI filings, corporate transparency requirements, or other regulatory matters, our team can provide the guidance you need. Stay tuned for updates as FinCEN refines its approach to BOI compliance. In the meantime, if you need assistance navigating these changes, contact Luchansky Law today.

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Maryland Delays Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program: What Employers Need to Know

In a significant development, the Maryland Department of Labor has proposed delaying the implementation of the state’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program. This postponement aims to provide additional time for businesses and employees to prepare for the program’s rollout, especially in light of recent federal workforce reductions and funding shifts impacting Maryland’s economy. Background on FAMLI Enacted in 2022, the FAMLI program is designed to offer Maryland workers up to 12 weeks of paid leave to care for themselves or family members facing serious health conditions, welcome a new child, or address needs related to a family member’s military deployment. The program ensures job protection and provides a portion of the employee’s wages during the leave period. Proposed Changes Originally, the FAMLI program was set to begin payroll contributions on July 1, 2025, with benefits becoming available on July 1, 2026. However, the Maryland Department of Labor has recommended the following adjustments: Payroll Deductions Start Date: Postponed to January 1, 2027. Benefits Availability Date: Deferred to January 1, 2028. This proposed delay is intended to grant businesses and employees more time to adapt to the new system, especially considering the economic uncertainties arising from recent federal decisions. Maryland Labor Secretary Portia Wu emphasized the state’s commitment to supporting its residents during these challenging times, stating, “State agencies like MD Labor are laser-focused on supporting Marylanders as we all respond in real time to the cascading impacts of federal decisions.”  Legislative Actions In response to the proposed delay, Maryland state Senator Stephen Hershey introduced Senate Bill 355, seeking to officially extend the FAMLI program’s effective dates by two years. During a Senate Finance Committee hearing on February 5, 2025, concerns were raised about the readiness of the program’s implementation and its potential economic impact on the business community.  Implications for Employers and Employees If the proposed delay is enacted, employers will have until January 1, 2027, to begin payroll deductions for the FAMLI program, with employees becoming eligible for benefits starting January 1, 2028. This extension provides additional time for businesses to adjust their payroll systems and for employees to plan for the upcoming changes. The Moore-Miller administration remains dedicated to implementing a robust paid family and medical leave program that benefits workers while maintaining the state’s economic competitiveness. The Maryland Department of Labor continues to develop the necessary digital infrastructure for claims processing and financial management to ensure a seamless transition once the program is launched.  Stay Informed As the situation evolves, it’s crucial for both employers and employees to stay informed about legislative developments related to the FAMLI program. For the most current information and updates, visit the Maryland Department of Labor’s official FAMLI page.  Luchansky Law is committed to keeping you updated on this and other legislative matters that impact your business and employment rights. For personalized legal guidance regarding the FAMLI program and its implications, please contact our office at: (410) 522-1020 | info@luchanskylaw.com |  www.luchanskylaw.com  About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a preeminent labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. Resources  OHS Online paidleave.maryland.gov

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

EEOC Policy Shift Under the New Administration: Key Changes Employers Must Know

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has recently announced several changes under the leadership of Acting Chair Andrea Lucas. These actions are part of an effort to refocus the agency’s mission on protecting women from sexual harassment and sex-based discrimination by rolling back certain gender identity policies from the previous administration.    The specific measures implemented by Acting Chair Lucas include: Prioritizing the Defense of Biological Sex: Emphasizing compliance, investigations, and litigation that uphold the recognition of biological and binary definitions of sex, including advocating for women’s rights to single-sex spaces in the workplace.  Removing the Pronoun Feature: Eliminating the agency’s “pronoun app,” a feature in employees’ Microsoft 365 profiles that allowed the display of chosen pronouns alongside employee names across platforms like Outlook and Teams.  Ending the Use of the “X” Gender Marker: Discontinuing the option to select an “X” gender marker during the intake process for filing a charge of discrimination.  Modifying Forms to Remove “Mx.” Prefix: Updating the charge of discrimination and related forms to exclude “Mx.” from the list of available prefix options.  Reviewing the “Know Your Rights” Poster: Initiating a review of the EEOC’s “Know Your Rights” poster, which employers are legally required to display in workplaces, with potential revisions forthcoming.  Removing Materials Promoting Gender Ideology: Conducting an ongoing review and removal of materials on the EEOC’s website and training programs that promote gender ideology.    It’s important to note that certain documents, such as the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace (issued by a 3-2 vote in 2024), the EEOC Strategic Plan 2022-2026, and the EEOC Strategic Enforcement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024-2028, cannot be unilaterally modified or removed by the Acting Chair without a majority vote from the full Commission. In her statement, Acting Chair Lucas emphasized, “Sex is binary (male and female) and immutable. It is not harassment to acknowledge these truths—or to use language like pronouns that flow from these realities, even repeatedly.” She also highlighted that “women have … safety interests, that warrant certain single-sex facilities at work and other spaces outside the home. It is neither harassment nor discrimination for a business to draw distinctions between the sexes in providing single-sex bathrooms or other similar facilities which implicate these significant privacy and safety interests.” These actions represent a significant shift in the EEOC’s approach to issues of sex and gender identity under the current administration.  If your business needs guidance on how these EEOC changes impact your workplace policies, Luchansky Law is here to help. Our team stays ahead of evolving employment laws to ensure your company remains compliant and protected. Contact us today to discuss your specific needs and safeguard your workplace. (410) 522-1020 | info@luchanskylaw.com |  www.luchanskylaw.com About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a premier labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. Sources eeoc.gov   https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/removing-gender-ideology-and-restoring-eeocs-role-protecting-women-workplace?utm_source=chatgpt.com   https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eeoc-acting-chair-issues-statement-on-8534448/

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

New DOL Rule: What Employers Need to Know About Worker Classification Under the FLSA

The U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) recently published its final rule (89 FR 1638) addressing how to determine whether a worker is classified as an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). This rule has significant implications for employers, as it refines the criteria used to evaluate worker classifications and underscores the importance of compliance. The original rule, published during the prior administration, focused on two core factors: the degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. It aimed to simplify the classification process but was criticized for potentially making it easier to classify workers as independent contractors.   The new rule departs from that approach by reinstating a broader “totality of the circumstances” analysis, incorporating six factors to assess economic dependence. This approach provides a more comprehensive framework, emphasizing the full scope of the working relationship rather than prioritizing a few key factors. Resource: U.S. Department of Labor – Final Rule on Independent Contractor Classification   Key Aspects of the Rule The DOL’s final rule emphasizes a “totality of the circumstances” approach, with the ultimate question being whether a worker is economically dependent on the employer or is in business for themselves. While the rule retains the “economic reality” test, it outlines six core factors that employers must evaluate: Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill Investment by the worker and the employer Degree of permanence of the work relationship Nature and degree of control exercised by the employer Extent to which the work is an integral part of the employer’s business Skill and initiative required for the work No single factor is determinative; rather, they are weighed collectively to assess whether the worker operates as an independent contractor or is economically dependent on the employer and thus classified as an employee.   Implications for Employers 1. Increased Scrutiny Employers should expect increased scrutiny of worker classifications under the revised framework. Misclassifying workers can lead to significant legal and financial consequences, including liability for back wages, overtime pay, and penalties. With the DOL’s heightened focus on enforcement, businesses should carefully evaluate their existing classifications. 2. Review of Contractor Agreements Businesses that rely on independent contractors should review their agreements and operational practices to ensure they align with the new rule’s criteria. Factors such as the contractor’s investment in tools or equipment, the permanence of the working relationship, and the level of control over work hours and tasks should be documented and defensible. 3. Operational Adjustments Employers may need to adjust operational practices to reflect the independent status of contractors. For example, allowing greater autonomy in how and when work is performed or reevaluating the permanence of relationships with contractors could help demonstrate compliance with the rule. 4. Proactive Compliance Measures To mitigate risks, employers should conduct internal audits of worker classifications and consult legal counsel to ensure adherence to the updated standards. Employee misclassification lawsuits are costly and time-consuming, making proactive compliance a wise investment.   Conclusion The DOL’s final rule underscores the need for employers to exercise diligence when classifying workers. By thoroughly understanding and applying the “economic reality” test, businesses can reduce the risk of misclassification and its associated penalties. Employers should stay informed of any future developments in this area, as worker classification continues to be a priority for federal and state labor agencies. For more information on how the DOL’s rule may affect your business, or to conduct a worker classification audit, contact the experienced attorneys at Luchansky Law.   About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a premier labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. Please call (410) 522-1020, email us at info@luchanskylaw.com, or stop by our office at 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B, Towson, Maryland, 21204.    Resources U.S. Department of Labor – Final Rule on Independent Contractor Classification Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Overview DOL Compliance Assistance Toolkit Worker Classification Under the FLSA Fact Sheet  

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Understanding the Intersection of FMLA and State Paid Family Leave Programs

LThe Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993 grants eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave annually for specific family and medical reasons. While FMLA leave is typically unpaid, employees may choose—or employers may require—the substitution of accrued paid leave to cover this period. This means that an employee’s accrued paid leave, such as vacation or sick leave, can run concurrently with FMLA leave, providing income during what would otherwise be an unpaid absence. In recent years, several states have implemented their own Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) programs, offering paid leave benefits to employees for qualifying family and medical reasons. These state programs are designed to complement federal provisions, providing wage replacement during leave periods. States like Maryland, California, New York, and Washington have enacted PFML laws, each with unique provisions regarding eligibility, duration, and funding. Do FMLA Substitution Rules Apply to State or Local Paid Family Leave Programs? A key question for employers and employees alike is whether FMLA regulations on the substitution of paid leave apply when employees take leave under state or local paid family leave programs. The answer lies in understanding the distinct nature of these benefits: FMLA Substitution of Paid Leave:Under FMLA, “substitution” refers to the practice of using accrued employer-provided paid leave (like vacation or sick leave) concurrently with FMLA leave. Importantly, FMLA’s substitution provisions apply to accrued paid leave provided by the employer, not to benefits from external sources like state PFML programs. State PFML Programs:State PFML benefits are typically funded through state-administered insurance programs, financed by payroll taxes paid by employees, employers, or both. These benefits are not considered accrued paid leave under an employer’s policies but are instead state-provided wage replacements. As such, FMLA substitution provisions do not apply to these benefits. Practical Implications for Employers and Employees When an employee takes leave that qualifies under both FMLA and a state PFML program, the two types of leave generally run concurrently. During this period, the employee receives wage replacement through the state program while being protected under FMLA’s job security provisions. Employers cannot require employees to substitute accrued paid leave for the period covered by state PFML benefits, as these are separate entitlements. However, employers and employees may agree to allow accrued paid leave to supplement state PFML benefits—such as where state benefits provide partial wage replacement—to achieve full salary coverage during the leave period. Key Takeaways FMLA substitution provisions apply only to employer-provided accrued paid leave, not to state PFML benefits. Employers and employees should familiarize themselves with the specific provisions of their state PFML program and its interaction with FMLA. Clear communication of leave policies and updates is critical to ensuring compliance and informed decision-making. For More Resources on FMLA and PFML Luchansky Law has previously explored topics related to FMLA and Maryland’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program. For additional insights, please see: Maryland is Preparing to Implement the Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) Program—Are You Prepared?This post details Maryland’s FAMLI program, which offers paid family leave benefits, and its implications for employers. Employers Can Challenge FMLA Certifications Without Obtaining Additional Medical OpinionsThis post discusses the rights of employers to challenge FMLA medical certifications and the regulatory framework for doing so.  Stay informed about federal and state developments at employmentattorneymd.com to navigate the complexities of FMLA and PFML compliance while supporting employees during critical life events.  Sign up for more content from Luchansky Law here.   About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a premier labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice. Please call (410) 522-1020, email us at info@luchanskylaw.com, or stop by our office at 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B, Towson, Maryland, 21204.       

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Nationwide Injunction Halts Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement

The injunction comes in response to legal challenges raised by business groups, which argued that the CTA’s requirements posed undue burdens on small businesses. While this ruling provides temporary relief, it is important to note that it is a preliminary measure and subject to change as the case proceeds.

Read More »
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Major Shift: DOL’s FLSA Salary Threshold Rule Vacated

Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a final rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that significantly increased the salary thresholds for exempt employees. This change, which aimed to extend overtime eligibility to an estimated 4 million workers, was expected to reshape workforce classifications nationwide. However, a recent court decision has vacated the rule, effective November 15, 2024, leaving employers with questions about compliance and next steps. A Closer Look at the FLSA Final Rule The DOL’s final rule increased the annual salary thresholds as follows: Standard Salary Level: From $684 per week ($35,568 annually) to $1,059 per week ($55,068 annually). Highly Compensated Employees (HCE): From $107,432 to $143,988 annually. These adjustments marked one of the most significant updates to the FLSA overtime regulations in years. The changes aimed to address wage growth and provide millions of employees with overtime protections under federal law. The Court’s Decision: What Happened? On November 15, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated the Department of Labor’s (DOL) final rule that increased the salary thresholds for exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court determined that the DOL exceeded its statutory authority by placing undue emphasis on salary levels rather than job duties when defining exemptions for executive, administrative, and professional employees. This ruling effectively nullifies the planned salary thresholds of $684 per week for exempt employees and $107,432 for HCEs and maintains the previous standards. This decision has disrupted compliance plans for many businesses that had already implemented salary adjustments or reclassified employees in anticipation of the rule’s enforcement. Implications for Employers The vacatur creates several challenges for employers, including: Reevaluation of Employee Classifications: Businesses may need to reassess exempt vs. non-exempt classifications to align with the prior salary thresholds. Payroll Adjustments: Employers who raised salaries to meet the now-vacated thresholds must decide whether to maintain the increases or revert to previous levels. Communication with Affected Employees: Clear and transparent communication is essential to address potential employee concerns arising from reclassification or payroll adjustments. Compliance Risks: Employers should ensure their practices align with the court’s decision to avoid exposure to wage and hour claims. What’s Next? While the court’s decision halts the implementation of this specific rule, employers should remain vigilant. Regulatory developments in wage and hour law are likely to continue, and the DOL may pursue alternative strategies to achieve its policy goals.  Key Takeaways from the Ruling  Review and update employee classifications and pay structures to ensure compliance with current salary thresholds. Monitor developments from the DOL and federal courts that may signal further changes to the FLSA. Seek legal guidance to address compliance challenges and mitigate risks. We will closely monitor developments regarding this rule, as the DOL may choose to appeal the court’s decision. In the meantime, we recommend reviewing employee classifications and thoughtfully evaluating any potential adjustments to compensation plans or exemption statuses.  About Luchansky Law At Luchansky Law, we understand the complexities of wage and hour compliance in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment. For assistance with navigating these changes or addressing specific concerns, please contact us today. Please call (410) 522-1020, or email us at info@luchanskylaw.com, or stop by our office at 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B, Towson, Maryland, 21204.    Resources  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-strikes-down-biden-overtime-pay-rule-2024-11-15/ https://www.dol.gov/newsroom https://www.federalregister.gov/  

Read More »

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

Let's talk.

Call us at 410-522-1020 or fill out the form below to receive a confidential initial consultation.

Name
Untitled