Maryland employers

Document Drafting

What is the Purpose of an Employee Handbook?

By AJ Esral, Esq. Handbooks. If you’ve ever worked for a company, chances are you’ve been handed one of these. They can run from a few pages to several hundred, often contain inexplicable passages of dense legalese, and are generally skimmed through briefly before being relegated to a drawer somewhere. What’s the point? It’s now 2026; is it time we finally drop this trend? No. Handbooks serve several important functions, both for employers and employees, by: setting clear expectations, and limiting legal liability … if they’re done right. There are plenty of ways to do it wrong and cause more harm than good. Poorly prepared handbooks typically are boilerplate documents that don’t say much and are difficult to understand.  As a result, they don’t accomplish either of the above purposes. Indeed, they sometimes end up shooting the employer in the foot. In the hope of avoiding that problem for you, I’ll provide a few tips for how to draft a handbook so it’s actually useful to both employers and employees. Let’s get into it. Setting Expectations Every company is its own microcosm. A hierarchy of important people, rules and rituals make the place run, and an implicit culture underlies the whole enterprise. As with any system, there is a learning curve for newcomers, and it doesn’t always come across quite right to ask all sorts of questions on the first day. What are the company’s preferred methods of communication? What can/should you wear? How is performance measured? How does PTO work? And so on. As an employer, this is your opportunity to tell your new employees everything they will inevitably ask you. Think about things such as: PTO: How and when to take leave, and PTO vs. unpaid leave. Payday: How payday works, what deductions are taken. Reporting channels: Who to go to with complaints or reports of harassment. Importantly, this is also your opportunity to tout the many benefits employees enjoy. If you provide life insurance, health benefits, and the like, you want to tell employees about their “hidden paycheck.” Many do not know that the employer pays into Social Security on their behalf, too. Claim credit for the money the employer pays to provide worker’s compensation coverage, and other benefits at no cost to the employee. This is also an opportunity to set expectations.  It is easier to compile a list of policies in advance than tell everyone on the fly, such as: Attendance and how to report absences; Any disciplinary frameworks; and Workplace conduct expectations, including behavior, dress code, and safety protocols. Bottom line: It’s much easier to reaffirm this information in a handbook in case it gets lost during the hustle and bustle of onboarding. The handbook serves as a kind of catch-all for anything you may have forgotten, and it can be referenced later as needed. But that’s not the only purpose of handbooks.  Limiting Liability “Please provide a copy of your handbook with the relevant policy or policies highlighted.” That is the first thing they ask for in most employment-related lawsuits or EEOC complaints. And for good reason: that’s the first (and often, only) place where the purportedly violated policy lives. This is why you often find policies about hiring in handbooks – topics like equal employment opportunity, background checks, and immigration compliance — even though by the time an employee gets it, chances are they’ve already been hired. It’s because those policies need to live somewhere. A company needs to have on record that it does things by the book; where else, other than in required legal postings, is the company going to put it? But there are lots of other good liability-related reasons an employer might want a handbook: No term contracts. It minimizes “implied contract” or “term contract” risks by stating in BIG, BOLD LETTERS up front that nothing in this handbook creates a term contract, and employment remains strictly at will. Discipline. It provides an express basis for discipline, which can help an employer convey to the employee that the action is not personal. “Sorry, but this is our policy.” Clear policies. It forces employers to think through and articulate how they want to run their company, which works to everyone’s benefit.  Most of the time, having established rules is better than making decisions – and creating policies – as issues arise. Obviously, to reap the benefits of a well-drafted handbook, you have to make sure each employee receives a copy of it. Many companies believe it is crucial to have an Employee Acknowledgment page that employees must sign to prove they received it.  We believe that a signature page often creates more problems than it solves.  What happens, for example, when an employee makes a complaint and you go looking for that employee’s signature page . . . but it is nowhere to be found?  If it is your policy that ALL employees MUST sign for their handbook, then the missing signature page is likely to become a point in favor of the employee.  “Hey, I never even saw the handbook!  Do you have a signature page that proves I did?” But how can you prove that your employees received the handbook if you don’t have a signature page?  The good news is that any record of distribution or evidence of your policy of distribution will do: a dated email to the employee, an electronic date stamp of distribution, or a new employee checklist that clearly states company policy to distribute the handbook and any subsequent changes or updates (even without proof that the handbook actually was distributed to the particular employee). Any of these create a rebuttable presumption in favor of the employer. We have discussed some of the important benefits of having a well-drafted handbook.  What are some of the hidden dangers that can be created by a poorly-drafted handbook? What to Look Out For Drafting mistakes include both the risk of forgetting to include certain policies, as well as including certain policies without realizing they are

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

LUCHANSKY LAW ALERT: Federal Labor Rollbacks Impacting Maryland Employers

What’s Happening: The U.S. Department of Labor has proposed rolling back or repealing more than 60 federal regulations deemed “obsolete” by the Trump administration. These changes are now in the public comment phase. AP News: Trump’s Labor Department proposes more than 60 rule changes in a push to deregulate workplaces(https://apnews.com/article/223309692fecb3721ef377154e7689ed) Washington Post: Trump to cut protections for home health aides, migrant farmworkers(https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/07/02/trump-labor-department/) ABC News: Trump’s Labor Department pushes deregulation effort(https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/trumps-labor-department-proposes-60-rule-push-deregulate-123949631) Key Proposed Changes: Maryland-Specific Impacts: Home Health Care WagesMaryland’s $15/hour minimum wage still applies. However, federal rollback of overtime rules may impact scheduling and classification. Construction & Mining SafetyRemoving OSHA and MSHA mandates may increase liability if state standards aren’t updated or enforced. H‑2A Farm WorkersMaryland farms could lose protection under repealed federal rules, with no comparable state statutes in place. Recommended Action Items for MD Employers:Home care agencies: Review overtime exemptions and scheduling. Construction/mining: Document safety practices around lighting and ventilation. H‑2A employers: Revisit transport protocols and strengthen anti-retaliation safeguards. All employers: Monitor federal rulemaking and potential legal challenges. Contact us today to discuss how these proposed changes may impact your business. (410) 522-1020 | info@luchanskylaw.com | www.luchanskylaw.com About Luchansky Law Luchansky Law is a premier labor and employment law firm committed to providing exceptional legal representation and client service. Founded in 2004 by Bruce Luchansky, the firm offers a wide range of legal services to businesses and individuals, focusing on workplace issues, employment disputes, and compliance. Luchansky Law is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of diligence, professionalism, and compassion in its practice.

Read More »
Employer's Toolbox

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Plaintiff in “Reverse Discrimination” Case

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark 9–0 decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, reinforcing that Title VII protections apply equally to all employees—regardless of their demographic background. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the majority opinion, concluding that courts cannot impose a higher burden of proof on so-called “majority‑group” plaintiffs (e.g., straight or white individuals). Case Background:Marlean Ames, a heterosexual Ohio state employee with over 15 years of service, alleged she was passed over for a promotion—and later demoted—while less-qualified LGBTQ+ colleagues were promoted in her stead. Lower courts had dismissed her Title VII claim due to a “background circumstances” requirement, which demanded extra proof from majority-group plaintiffs—a standard now struck down by the Supreme Court. Key Takeaways: Equal Legal Standard: Title VII applies to any individual, regardless of race, sex, or sexual orientation. Courts may no longer apply heightened pleading standards based on a plaintiff’s group identity. Majority-Group Plaintiffs Protected: Members of majority groups can now pursue discrimination claims under the same legal framework as anyone else. Potential Rise in Claims: This decision may lead to an increase in claims challenging the fairness of workplace DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) programs. What This Means for Maryland Employers Apply Policies Uniformly: Ensure discrimination protections apply equally to all employees. Document Employment Decisions: Use objective criteria in hiring and promotions, and maintain clear records. Investigate All Complaints Fairly: Complaints from majority-group employees must be taken seriously and evaluated without bias. Contact Us Luchansky Law helps Maryland employers stay compliant with ever-evolving employment laws. Whether you need assistance updating your HR policies, handling a discrimination complaint, or defending your business in court, our team is here to help.  Call us at (410) 522-1020 Learn more at employmentattorneymd.com Contact us today for a consultation. References: Washington Post – Supreme Court sides with woman claiming anti-straight job discrimination Time – Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Straight Woman In ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Case Reuters – US Supreme Court makes ‘reverse’ discrimination suits easier SCOTUSblog – Case analysis of Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services

Read More »

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

Let's talk.

Call us at 410-522-1020 or fill out the form below to receive a confidential initial consultation.

Name
Untitled